Cartography: Art or Science?


 

My first book, GIS Cartography: A Guide to Effective Map Design, lays out the methods for creating great maps in terms of creativity, color, typefaces, layout, and data-specific recommendations (geology, political boundaries, elevation, to name a few). It has received a lot of praise. There’s also been a few naysayers out there who are mostly hung-up on its practicality and who would rather see cartography highly systematized.

There are always a few people at the very ends of the spectrum: those who feel cartography is primarily an art and those who feel it is a science. Those on the art-side think that teaching cartography or receiving degrees in it is ridiculous, let alone PhDs. Those on the science side would rather that nobody practice cartography without a thorough understanding (read: traditional learning) and application of the rules and theory.

The majority of map makers today are in-between these two camps both in their allegiance and their practices. Cartographers really need to remain open-minded about both the art and the science sides of cartography. To be receptive of the art-side is to accept that the best innovations spring from unforeseen places. To learn the science is to make life easier for both yourself and your map readers by applying common standards.

The book makes this distinction, encouraging the blending of both camps into your professional life for superior outputs.

 

  1. #1 by Leigh Holcombe on June 8, 2012 - 1:15 pm

    What bothers me is art masquerading as science. Many old pencil&paper cartographers consider their freehand squiggles to be an important part of the cartographic process, and I have heard a few say that curves generated from actual data points aren’t “realistc” enough. There’s definitely some quality in hand-drawn maps that is missing from computer-generated maps, but I don’t conflate that quality with realism.

  2. #2 by Gretchen on June 8, 2012 - 2:49 pm

    Those with GIS backgrounds, especially, tend to agree with you, Leigh.

  3. #3 by Gretchen Peterson (@PetersonGIS) on June 8, 2012 - 2:51 pm

    agreed RT @redgeographics to me #cartography is a healthy mix between art and science http://t.co/ANNgrIUc

  4. #4 by @DanUthman on June 9, 2012 - 5:58 pm

    #Cartography: Art or science? I’ve always said both. Eager to see this new book by @PetersonGIS http://t.co/KisLND4t

Comments are closed.